The U.S. Supreme Court has recently declined to hear two significant cases challenging state-level firearm restrictions, effectively leaving lower court rulings in place for Delaware and Maryland. In the first instance, the justices rejected an appeal regarding Delaware’s ban on assault-style rifles and large-capacity magazines. This legal challenge, brought by gun rights groups such as the Firearms Policy Coalition and the Second Amendment Foundation, sought to overturn laws enacted in 2022 that prohibit the sale of weapons like the AR-15 and AK-47. While the law allows current owners to keep their firearms under specific conditions, it strictly prohibits new purchases and limits magazine capacity to 17 rounds.
In a separate action, the court turned away an appeal from the group Maryland Shall Issue concerning Maryland’s handgun licensing requirements. Plaintiffs argued that the state’s rigorous vetting process violated the Second Amendment, but the justices opted not to interfere with a lower court’s decision that found the law aligned with constitutional protections. These decisions are particularly notable given the court’s current 6-3 conservative majority, which has traditionally favored an originalist interpretation of gun rights in major decisions dating back to 2008. By declining these specific cases, the high court avoids immediate intervention in the ongoing debate over the scope of state-level regulatory power. The court’s refusal to act occurs amidst a complex legal landscape where several other challenges remain. For example, cases involving Rhode Island’s magazine limits and Maryland’s separate assault weapons ban are still pending or have not yet received definitive rulings from the high court. While FBI crime statistics indicate that handguns are involved in the vast majority of gun-related murders, lawmakers frequently target semiautomatic rifles due to their use in mass shootings. For now, the Supreme Court allows these state-specific restrictions to stand, maintaining the status quo for residents in those jurisdictions.
